Court Blocks Trump’s Plan to Move $1.6 Trillion Student Loans to SBA

Get an AI-generated summary of this article.

AI-generated article summary

Key Points:

  • A federal judge stopped President Donald Trump’s plan to move $1.6 trillion in student loans from the U.S. Department of Education to the Small Business Administration (SBA).
  • Trump proposed transferring 40 million student loan accounts to the SBA in March 2025.
  • The transfer needs Congress to change the Higher Education Act of 1965.


Judge Stops Trump’s Loan Plan

On May 22, 2025, Judge Myong J. Joun in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction. It blocks President Trump’s plan to shift $1.6 trillion in federal student loans from the U.S. Department of Education to the Small Business Administration (SBA).

A federal judge blocks Trump's proposal to transfer student loans to SBA.
On March 24, 2025, people walked by the U.S. Small Business Administration headquarters in Washington, DC.

The judge ordered the reinstatement of 1,300 employees from the Education Department. He also halted Trump’s order to move student loan and special education tasks. Currently, 40 million student loan accounts remain with the Federal Student Aid office.

On March 21, 2025, Trump announced the loan transfer plan. “They’re all set for it,” he said of the SBA. “They’re waiting for it.” He claimed it would make the Education Department more efficient. But the SBA planned a 43% staff cut, leaving fewer workers to manage millions of accounts. The Higher Education Act of 1965 states that the Education Department is responsible for handling student loans, so any change requires congressional approval.

Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the Education Department, criticized the ruling. “A far-left Judge has overstepped his authority,” she told CNBC. She said the decision, based on biased complaints, blocks legal efforts to improve the department. The Trump administration requested a pause in the order during the appeal. On X, users, such as @EducationNews, supported keeping loans with the Education Department. They praised its experience over the SBA’s.

The ruling helps borrowers, said Sarah Sattelmeyer of New America. “Moving loans would have caused chaos,” she said. “It would weaken programs students need.” Past smaller transfers between loan servicers caused errors and privacy leaks. A massive SBA transfer could be worse. Borrowers fear losing Public Service Loan Forgiveness, a program that cancels debt for public workers. On X, @StudentDebtCrisis called the plan “a disaster waiting to happen.”

The SBA has no experience with student loans, said expert Mark Kantrowitz. “It’s not built for this,” he told CNBC. Moving $1.6 trillion in loans needs Congress to rewrite the law. The Higher Education Act assigns loans to the Department of Education. On X, @HigherEdWatch called Trump’s idea “reckless.” The SBA’s planned staff cuts would make managing 40 million accounts nearly impossible, they said.

The court order delays Trump’s plan, but an appeal could alter the situation. Borrowers face stress as loan collections restarted in May 2025. Defaulted borrowers risk wage garnishment. Advocates want Congress to set clear rules. A New America report stated that the transfer could disrupt payments and harm credit scores. For now, the Education Department keeps control, but the fight isn’t over.

About Writer

Nathan Enzo
Nathan Enzo
A professional writer since 2014 with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Mass Communication, Nathan Enzo ran the creative writing department for the major News Channels until 2018. He then worked as a Senior content writer with LiveNewsof.com, including national newspapers, magazines, and online work. He specializes in media studies and social communications.

More News

Trump Criticizes Pope Leo Over Iran Peace Appeal

US President Donald Trump has sparked fresh controversy after publicly criticizing Pope Leo following the pontiff’s appeal for peace amid the ongoing Iran conflict. The clash highlights growing tension between political leadership in Washington and the Vatican’s moral stance on war and global diplomacy. The dispute began after Pope Leo made a strong statement urging world leaders to avoid further escalation and prioritize peace. Without directly naming Trump, the pope warned against using power or religion to justify war. His remarks were widely interpreted as criticism of US policy. Trump responded on social media, calling the pope weak on crime and...

Why Trump Is Blockading a Strait Iran Is Already Blocking

After peace talks in Islamabad collapsed, President Trump announced the US Navy would “immediately” begin blockading the Strait of Hormuz. There is one obvious question: why would the US blockade a waterway it has been demanding Iran reopen? The Strait Is Not Fully Closed Iran has not technically sealed the Strait completely. It has been allowing some vessels through in exchange for tolls of up to $2 million per ship. Crucially, Iran has kept its own oil flowing throughout the war, exporting an average of 1.85 million barrels per day through March, slightly above pre-war levels, according to data firm Kpler. The...

Islamabad Talks | US and Iran Fail to Reach a Deal After 21 Hours

The most significant US-Iran diplomatic meeting since the 1979 Islamic Revolution ended without a deal on Sunday. After 21 hours of face-to-face talks in Islamabad. Both sides left the table blaming each other. The ceasefire that expires April 22 now hangs by a thread. What Happened in the Room The talks were the first direct US-Iranian engagement since the 2015 top-level engagement. Vice President JD Vance led the American delegation alongside Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Iran was represented by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Al Jazeera's correspondent in Islamabad described the outcome as “neither a breakthrough...

US Iran Talks Could Reshape Middle East Power Balance

A Rare Diplomatic Moment Between US and Iran The United States and Iran have entered a critical phase of diplomacy as both countries begin direct negotiations in Islamabad, Pakistan. These US Iran talks come after weeks of rising tensions that brought both nations close to conflict. While a temporary ceasefire is currently in place, the situation remains fragile. This meeting is significant because it represents one of the few direct engagements between Washington and Tehran in recent history. For decades, relations between the US and Iran have been shaped by mistrust and political conflict. The decision to begin talks shows that...

Five points to know about Iran US Talks in Islamabad

Pakistan is hosting one of the most consequential diplomatic meetings in decades. The United States and Iran are holding their highest level talks in years in Islamabad, in a Pakistan brokered bid to turn a fragile two week ceasefire into a lasting end to a war that has roiled global energy markets. The War That Made These Talks Necessary On February 28, the US and Israel launched deadly coordinated strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and struck Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure. More than 3,000 people were killed in Iran in five weeks, according to Iranian media and...

Latest Articles