Trump administration ‘disappointed’ as U.K. grants Huawei access to 5G networks

0
Washington – The Trump administration Tuesday showed disappointment after the U.K. decided it would allow China’s telecommunications giant Huawei limited access to certain British 5G cellular networks.

A senior Trump administration member wrote in an emailed to CNBC that “The United States is disappointed by the U.K.’s stance. The Trump administration will work with the U.K. on the way forward that results in the removal of untrusted vendor components from 5G networks.”

US and UK disagreement over China access to 5G networks

The U.K. said equipment manufactured by Huawei wouldn’t be banned, but that entry will be prohibited from “sensitive functions.”

Boris Johnson’s government made the decision despite cautions from President Trump, who has called Johnson a “friend.”
The latest development from the U.K comes at a time when Trump administration is working to isolate Chinese tech companies from generating a larger foothold in the U.S. partner countries. The administration specifically worked to hold back members of the “five eyes” intelligence-sharing group, which includes the U.S., Canada, U.K., New Zealand and Australia, from working with Huawei.
In 2018, the Pentagon suspended trades of Huawei and ZTE mobile phones and modems on military bases worldwide due to potential security concerns.

“We continue to ask all of our associates and allies to cautiously assess the multifaceted impact of letting untrusted vendors access to significant 5G network infrastructures,” Lt. Col. Dave Eastburn, Pentagon spokesman, wrote in a statement to CNBC.
“It’s been assessed that there’s no safe option for untrusted vendors to handle any part of a 5G network,” Eastburn added.

Long-standing U.S.-China concerns

The U.S. authorities have long complained that China’s intellectual property theft has cost the economy billions of dollars in revenue and hundreds of thousands of jobs and that it threatens national security. China, in its part, denies any engagement in intellectual property theft.

When questioned about the issue by CNBC on his first day as the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper said he was “very alert about Chinese technology getting into our systems or the systems of our allies.”

“Huawei appeared poster child right now for that,” Esper said, adding that the U.S. trade war with China is as crucial for the national security as it is for the economy.

Esper while referring to a NATO visit he made while acting Defense Secretary, said that “When I was in Brussels three weeks ago we discussed about this among defense ministers, on how do we sustain the integrity of our networks as an alliance, and so that will continue to be important for me as we progress ahead.”

When and how the U.K. announced China’s participation in its 5G network?

Last year, even with national security precautions, then-U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May reportedly passed a plan to allow Huawei to build part of the U.K.’s 5G network. Her decision was leaked, resulting in the dismissal of then-Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson.

Williamson has turned down allegations that he was the source of the leak.

A month earlier Williamson’s removal, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford stated that if U.S. allies carried on with Huawei’s equipment, intelligence cooperation could be undermined.
He spoke to a House Appropriations subcommittee in April 2019 that “One of the things that accentuates an alliance is the ability to share data and when we share data with allies and partners we have to have common standards of data assurance. We have to ensure that our secrets are protected, whether it be intelligence or technology sharing.”

Interpreting Dunford’s opinions, then-acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan told lawmakers that “China aims to steal its way to a Chinese-controlled global technological infrastructure, including 5G.”
“Huawei exemplifies China’s Communist Party’s organized, systematic, and state-driven strategy to get global leadership in advanced technology.”

What’s more, the Director of National Intelligence, in conjunction with the heads of the CIA, FBI, NSA, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and Defense Intelligence Agency testified before lawmakers in 2018 on serious security risks posed by Huawei and ZTE.
“We’re extremely concerned about the risks of tolerating any company or entity that is beholden to foreign governments that don’t share our values to achieve places of power inside our telecommunications network,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray to U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee.
“It brings the capacity to modify or steal data unlawfully. And it also brings the capacity to conduct undetected espionage,” Wray added.

Huawei denials

Huawei and ZTE have rejected allegations that their equipment is used to spy on Americans.

The U.S. government has been warning against the products of both Huawei and ZTE since the beginning of 2012. The Chinese company was facing a ban since that time, with an executive order from President Trump making those recommendations official.

“U.S. government systems shouldn’t deploy any of the equipment from Huawei or ZTE,” according to a 2012 report by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. “Likewise, government contractors, precisely those working on contracts for sensitive U.S. structure, should exclude Huawei or ZTE equipment from their systems.”

As for Huawei’s so-called ties to Beijing, the company has strongly declined accusations.
The 2012 report and later intelligence briefings on Huawei do not contain specific evidence of Huawei’s ties to Beijing government but proclaim that the risk of allowing the Chinese telecommunications giant to supply this critical equipment is too great.

Huawei representatives have expressed they have frequently asked the Department of Defense to permit the company to submit to a risk mitigation process, but no deal has ever conversed.

The 2012 report contains that the task of identifying and disposing every challenging vulnerability from a multifaceted product is monumental. And that, if we take into account the flaws intentionally inserted by a determined and clever insider, the task becomes virtually impossible.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here